I don't think there should be laws to slow the growth of human population. if there were laws, there would be less people in the U.S.A., and then people would go crazy, and the President wouldn't know what to do except cancel the laws.
I don't think that there should be laws to slow down the growth of human population. But, China should let people leave the country so it stops getting over populated.
I think there should be, but I don't think they should be extreme. If something went wrong, it might be that we end up killing each other to control the population.
I do not think that we should do population control, it takes away human rights, also it can lead to people hiding children in closets and also can lead to rebellion.
I think that there should be some laws but not big changes. I think that the worse thing that could happen is there could be a lot of law breaking more then there is,because people wouldn't like these laws.
There possibly could be laws about human population to keep the world from its maximum population, something that could go wrong is eventually there could become of a game such as the Hunger Games.
No, we should not slow down human population unless we hit the carrying capacity.Something that could go wrong is a defect in the way they sow down the population.
It depends, countries like China already have them. Really, they aren't needed. Unless the population of one area gets too large to where that we can no longer function. We should be okay.
If the government said that there can only be certain numbers of people the problem would be if there were to many babies being born, they would have to kill them. Thats what could go wrong.
I think there should be laws to slow the growth of human population but only if the population if it gets really high, like setting a amount of kids you can have in a household.
No, there shouldn't be a law, people should be able to make their own choices, it's part of freedom. If there was a law, people could break it, if they wanted to.
61 comments:
The Hunger Games and The Giver
If there were laws about human groth then they would have to kill people.
I don't think there should be laws to slow the growth of human population. if there were laws, there would be less people in the U.S.A., and then people would go crazy, and the President wouldn't know what to do except cancel the laws.
I don't think that there should be laws to slow down the growth of human population. But, China should let people leave the country so it stops getting over populated.
People could find out what you are doing .
There would also be less people on the Earth.
There would be little people everywhere.
I don't think that there should laws until there are problems with resources.
the people would be outraged and try to overrun the person in charge
Like in the Giver there are birth mothers and one of them is having a twin
One thing is that some one could have there own kid.
there would be riots and people would die
I think there should be, but I don't think they should be extreme. If something went wrong, it might be that we end up killing each other to control the population.
there shouldn't but if there was people could hide there kids and the population could go down too fast.
There should be laws to stop the human pouplatioon growth we could use birth control and stuff like that to stop the poupltaion growth
I do not think that we should do population control, it takes away human rights, also it can lead to people hiding children in closets and also can lead to rebellion.
Some people wouldn't follow the laws.
A anuel purge of killing.
there would be riots and people would die
I think no we should not have a law
The wost thing that could happen is cannibals.
There would be a lot more people that won't follow the laws.
Think of the movie called The Purge
We sould have only like 3 kids per household
I dont think there should be laws.
I think that there should be some laws but not big changes. I think that the worse thing that could happen is there could be a lot of law breaking more then there is,because people wouldn't like these laws.
Um uprisings, death, messed up, unnecessary violence, strict rules horrible stuff.
My guess would be canibalisom and people geting mad because they cant have children.
There possibly could be laws about human population to keep the world from its maximum population, something that could go wrong is eventually there could become of a game such as the Hunger Games.
No, we should not slow down human population unless we hit the carrying capacity.Something that could go wrong is a defect in the way they sow down the population.
It depends, countries like China already have them. Really, they aren't needed. Unless the population of one area gets too large to where that we can no longer function. We should be okay.
If the government said that there can only be certain numbers of people the problem would be if there were to many babies being born, they would have to kill them. Thats what could go wrong.
There shouldn't be laws to slow down the human growth.but China should let people leave the so it stops getting over populated.
Eventually there will most likely be a law but for now i think we are OK.
YES! it is working in china, in the USA..... idk :3
I don't think there should be that law because if someone broke it they would have to kill the kid or something.
Yes, there should be laws to slow the growth of human population. It could go wrong by killing a bunch of people.
There could be a lot of murdering and it would be bad to have laws like that.
Yes but the world could end.
kill all but 2 and then restart from there
I think there should be laws to slow the growth of human population but only if the population if it gets really high, like setting a amount of kids you can have in a household.
I do not think that there should be laws. If there were laws then we would have to kill people for no reason.
Yes and too little people would not have major consequences, maybe.
And if there were laws about not having a lot of kids there wouldn't be a lot of people to collect resources.
No there should not be laws, because even if there was laws people would break them anyway if it has to do with children.
If there were such laws there would probably riots.
There could be people trying to kill each other.
There should be no laws because it would become very depressed and life wouldn't be fun anymore.
There should be laws with countries with the population going out of control.
There should be laws there are today. If there were more, it would cause problems like the books above.
yes there should be a law to prevent the human populations from growing to much
Yes and it should decrease the homelessness and hunger.
No, there shouldn't be a law, people should be able to make their own choices, it's part of freedom. If there was a law, people could break it, if they wanted to.
I think there should be not any laws on the human growth.Because people would go crazy.
I don't think there should be laws. But if there were there might be people trying to kill eachother.
There should be laws because people could steal from other people and not get in trouble.
No.People could rebel and think they are losing their freedom.
I dont think that there should be laws agaisnt having a certain amount of children. If there was laws then people would disobey them anyways.
I don't think that we should because it would be like world war 2 all over again because people will get very mad and start killing.
The human population might overthrow the laws that forbid the growing of the population, No there should not be laws.
Post a Comment