Because there was always a different theory that the ground was flat and there were no cracks in the ground and the fact that he dident have much evidence to prove his theory
Because they thought that if the continental drift was going to happen they would have thought that the ground would shake so they thought he was crazy.
it got rejected at first because he did not bring enough evidence but 30 years after he died someone brought more evidence to support his theory and it was true
he had evidence that the waves and moving continents made the earth spin so they thought it was impossible so they didn't believe him so he really didn't have any proof.
60 comments:
He didn't have enough evidence about how the continents moved.
because he did not have enough evidence on how the continents split apart.
Because he did not have enough evidence about how the continents drifted.
he worked as a science person
not enouph evidence
He didn't have enough evidence about how the continents moved.
didn't have enough evidence about how the continents moved.
He didnt have enogh evidence
his theory was rejected because no one believed him or figured it out other that him.
He did not have enough evidence to prove he was right
Because it seemed way to fake, or made up. It was hard to believe.
There was not enough evidence to pass it.
Because people always said that the ground was flat and didn't think that there was cracks in the earth.
Because it was believed that there was no cracks in the earth.
He did not have enough evidence.
he did not have enough evidence so they did not believe him
Alfred Wegener's theory about continental drift was rejected at first because he didn't have any evidence and it was hard to believe.
He didn't have enough evidence about how the continents moved.
He thought that the continents were separating and breaking apart, but know one believed him.
His teroy was right after 30 years afteer he died.
Because there was always a different theory that the ground was flat and there were no cracks in the ground and the fact that he dident have much evidence to prove his theory
There wasn't enough evidence.
Because they thought that if the continental drift was going to happen they would have thought that the ground would shake so they thought he was crazy.
Alfred Wegener's theory about continental drift was rejected at first because he didn't have any evidence to show he was right.
Because he couldn't explain why it happened.
There was not enough evidence to prove his theory.
Because that would make the ground shake and that would just be pure insanity, right? RIGHT?!
Alfred Wegener's theory was first rejected because he didn't have enough evidence to prove it.
The theory was first rejected because it had no evidence to prove the theory.
it got rejected at first because he did not bring enough evidence but 30 years after he died someone brought more evidence to support his theory and it was true
They didn't believe him because he had no proof and only a hypothesis
They didn't believe him because he did not have a lot of evidence to back up his theory.
It was rejected because there was no evidence at the time.
It
(period)
I think it was because Alfred wegner had no proof.
The theory was rejected at first rejected because there was no way to prove the theory.
It got rejected at first because he did not bring enough evidence until 30 years after he died someone brought evidence to prove his theory was true.
At the time he did not have any evidences and they thought he was crazy.
Alfred Wegener had no proof.
They didn't believe him because he thought that the spin of the earth made the continents drift apart, which was just crazy.
They did not believe him, and he had no proof. They thought that he was crazy!
Maybe he had no proof?
he had evidence that the waves and moving continents made the earth spin so they thought it was impossible so they didn't believe him so he really didn't have any proof.
Alfred Wegener's theory was first rejected because he didn't have enough evidence to prove it
There wasn't enough evidence!
It was rejected because they did not underestand
He thought that all the countries fit together like a puzzle and they were moving apart from one another.
Because there wasn't enough tech, which made it harder to believe as a theory. So, therefor, people thought he was CRAZY!!!
Nobody Believed him because there was not enough evidence to prove it.
He did not have enough evidence or proof
He had no proof.
He didn't have enough proof
So basically, there wasn't enough evidence.
Wegeners idea was rejected because he had no evidence for the Pangaea.
Because he had not enough evidence on how they moved.
They did not believe him because he did not have good proof to back him self up
He didn't have enough evidence to prove his theory.
He did not have enough evidence.
He didn't have enough evidence and they didn't believe him until after he died.
Alfred Wegener didn't have enough evidence.
Post a Comment