What do you think scientist did before photography to create a visual record? Look up images created by James John Audubon. What do you think about his images would they be helpful for science?
43 comments:
Griffin M.
said...
I think they drew stuff by looking at what they wanted to draw. I think that scientists paid the artists to draw them.
Before photography was invented people drew pictures. James John Autobon created paintings of wildlife. I am not sure his paintings would be to helpful to science.
The drew pictures to document the discoveries they made. I think James John Auburn's images could help understand the characteristics of birds and how they help the bird function.
43 comments:
I think they drew stuff by looking at what they wanted to draw. I think that scientists paid the artists to draw them.
The scientists used them to study the birds
leonardo da vinci drew the picture
there used to study and stuff about birds
I think that to be able to draw the picture's they used to have to study the animal or object.
I think they drew painted and other artsy stuff i think they look so realistic they look fake almost but they would be helpful to science i guess.
The scientists were studying birds and the scientists made James John Audubon drew the pictures.
They used to draw pictures of the thing they were studying. And I do think that they were helpful in science (Audubon's drawings anyway).
The scientists back then drew to show what they found out the words serve as captions.
Well... they drew the stuff (it's pretty obvious).
they just drew things
He drew birds so no I don't think so.
I think they drew pictures. :D
nah man it be drawn like de poopoo
The drew da stuff.
They drew pictures.
Yes. These drawings would be very helpful to see as a scientist because they could see what people saw as science back when it was drawn.
The scientists back then drew to show what they found out the words serve as captions.
The scientists would draw what they were studying or pay an artist to do it. I do think that what he drew could help in science.
Jasmine M.
They drew things to help study the things they were looking at..... (Idk)
They drew pictures. I don't think the pictures would be helpful.
the dew images
loganm
They had artist draw them
They used to draw pictures of the thing they were studying. And I do think that they were helpful in science (Audubon's drawings anyway).patick hussey
They would draw instead of photography, and it would be helpful because they could have a visual of what they they were studying.
yes they would
They drew pictures.
In order to create a visual record, scientists would draw pictures.
They drew pictures.
PICTURES
The scientists would draw what they were studying or pay an artist to do it. I do think that what he drew could help in science.
They would draw pictures and i do think they could be helpful.
Before photography was invented people drew pictures. James John Autobon created paintings of wildlife. I am not sure his paintings would be to helpful to science.
he did pic of animals some are really OLD
They used to draw pictures of the thing they were studying. And I do think that they were helpful in science (Audubon's drawings anyway).
I think they wold draw what it looked like
The scientists would draw what they were studying or pay an artist to do it. I do think that what he drew could help in science.
They used to draw pictures of the thing they were studying. And I do think that they were helpful in science
they recorded the discoveries that they made
The scientists back then drew to show what they found !!..!!!!
He drew pictures and one of the pictures that he created a picture of a guy here it is.
http://www.nndb.com/people/818/000022752/
I think they drew pictures to get a better visual.
The drew pictures to document the discoveries they made. I think James John Auburn's images could help understand the characteristics of birds and how they help the bird function.
Post a Comment